Water Conflicts in Urbanizing Regions in the Himalaya: Case Studies from Dhulikhel and Bidur in Nepal

Authors

  • Kamal Devkota Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies
  • Dil Khatri Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies
  • Kaustuv Raj Neupane Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53037/na.v5i1.13

Keywords:

Water conflicts, urbanization, upstream-downstream cooperation, Himalaya

Abstract

Evidences suggest the growing problem of water scarcity in Himalayan towns due to rapid urbanization, variation in land use and climate change. The scarcity has led to different forms of water related conflicts. This paper documents the drivers and dynamics of water related conflicts in Himalayan towns and explores the potentialities for cooperation in resolving these conflicts based on detailed case study of two mid-hill towns in Nepal. Data were gathered using key informant interviews, focused group discussions, stakeholder consultations and participant observations. The key forms of conflicts emerged from the case study include a) upstream-downstream contestation for access to and/or control over water; b) tension caused by disparities in water distribution within urban region and c) competing use of water for domestic and other purposes. The major drivers of such conflicts include growing water demand both in upstream and downstream areas, declining water sources exacerbated by climate change and urbanization. In both cases of Dhulikhel and Bidur, water for municipal supply was acquired from upstream rural areas using political influence. However, the agreements forged between towns and upstream villages were later contested
by empowered upstream people. This suggests that socio-political relations have key role in governing water access. Insights from these cases reinforces the argument that local water management is a political agenda and resolving contestation and conflicts require enhanced cooperation and deliberation. We see the need for institutional mechanisms for forging cooperation and inclusive decision-making practices towards better local water governance.

Author Biography

  • Kamal Devkota, Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies

    Researcher

References

REFERENCES

Angelo, H. and Wachsmuth, D., 2015. Urbanizing urban political ecology: a critique of methodological cityism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), pp.16-27.

Bakker, K., Kooy, M., Shofiani, N.E. and Martijn, E.J., 2008. Governance failure: rethinking the institutional dimensions of urban water supply to poor households. World Development, 36(10), pp.1891-1915.

Bakker, K., 2012. Water: political, biopolitical, material. Social Studies of Science, 42(4), pp.616-623.

Bartlett, S., 2003. Water, sanitation and urban children: the need to go beyond “improved” provision. Environment and Urbanization, 15(2), pp.57-70.

Bhatia, R. and Falkenmark, M., 1993. Water resource policies and the urban poor: innovative approaches and policy imperatives. World Bank.

Böhmelt, T., Bernauer, T., Buhaug, H., Gleditsch, N.P., Tribaldos, T. and Wischnath, G., 2014. Demand, supply, and restraint: determinants of domestic water conflict and cooperation. Global Environmental Change, 29, pp.337-348

Carius, A., Dabelko, G.D., Wolf, A.T., 2004. Water, conflict, and cooperation. Environmental Change and Security Project Report 10, pp.60–66. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327107780160300.

Carter Centre, 2011. Carter center observation on political parties in local bodies, pp.1–7.

CBS, 2011. National population and housing census 2011. Kathmandu: Central Bureau of Statistics.

Celio, M., Scott, C.A. and Giordano, M., 2010. Urban–agricultural water appropriation: the Hyderabad, India case. The Geographical Journal, 176(1), pp.39-57.

Chan, K.M., Anderson, E., Chapman, M., Jespersen, K. and Olmsted, P., 2017. Payments for ecosystem services: rife with problems and potential—for transformation towards sustainability. Ecological Economics, 140, pp.110-122.

Cornea, N., Zimmer, A. and Véron, R., 2016. Ponds, power and institutions: the everyday governance of accessing urban water bodies in a small Bengali city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(2), pp.395-409.

Dabelko, D. and Aaron, T., 2004. Water, conflict, and cooperation. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 10, pp.60-66.

Desfor, G. and Keil, R., 2004. Nature and the city: making environmental policy in Toronto and Los Angeles. University of Arizona Press.

Devkota, K., Dahal, N., Neupane, K.R., Joshi, T., 2014. Collusion to Consensus Case of water source negotiation in Bidur, Nepal. In: Ecosystem Services and Povert Alleviation, ESPA annual science meeting. Delhi, 26-27 November 2014.

Devkota, K. and Neupane, K.R., 2018. Water governance in rapidly urbanizing small town: a case of Dhulikhel in Nepal. Journal of Water Security, 4.

Devkota, K., Kovacs, E., Neupane, K.R., Ojha, H., Vira, B., 2015. Negotiating water security: dynamics of up and down stream water management in two small towns in Nepal’s Himalaya. In: Social Science Baha, Fourth annual Kathmandu conference on Nepal and the Himalaya. Kathmandu, 22-24 July 2015.

Falkenmark, M., 1992. Water scarcity generates environmental stress and potential conflicts. Water, Development, and the Environment, 279.

Franks, T. and Cleaver, F., 2007. Water governance and poverty: a framework for analysis. Progress in Development Studies, 7(4), pp.291-306.

Funder, M., Mweemba, C., Nyambe, I., van Koppen, B. and Ravnborg, H.M., 2010. Understanding local water conflict and cooperation: the case of Namwala District, Zambia. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35, pp.758–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pce.2010.07.022

Ghimire, A., Niraula, V. and Khatiwada, N.R., 2016, Dhulikhel water treatment plant Dhulikhel, Nepal, Network on water technology in Asia and pacific and Asian institute of technology. [online] Available at :http://www.jwrcnet.or.jp/aswin/en/newtap/report/ NewTap_026.pdf

Gooijer, G. and Thomasson, F., 2006. Water and urban conflict: discussion on issues and a review of Sida Project, SIDA.

Heynen, N., 2016. Urban political ecology. International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology, pp.1-9.

Heynen, N., Kaika, M. and Swyngedouw, E. eds., 2006. In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. Routledge. Hommes, L. and Boelens, R., 2017. Urbanizing rural waters: rural-urban water transfers and the reconfiguration of hydrosocial territories in Lima. Political Geography, 57, pp.71-80.

Just, R.E. and Netanyahu, S. eds., 2012. Conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resources (Vol.11). Springer Science & Business Media.

Kanbur, R. and Venables, A.J. eds., 2005. Spatial inequality and development. OUP Oxford.

Kovacs, E., Kumar, C., Agarwal, C., Adams, W., Hope, R.A. and Vira, B., 2016. The politics of negotiation and implementation: a reciprocal water access agreement in the Himalayan foothills, India.

Kosoy, N. and Corbera, E., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological economics, 69(6), pp.1228-1236.

Link, P.M., Scheffran, J. and Ide, T., 2016. Conflict and cooperation in the water-security nexus: a global comparative analysis of river basins under climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 3(4), pp.495-515.

Malama, A. and Kazimbaya-Senkwe, B., 2004. Privatization from above and from below: a comparative analysis of the privatization of water and sanitation and solid waste management services in the city of Kitwe’, an independent research paper, Botswana.

McDonald, R.I., Douglas, I., Grimm, N.B., Hale, R., Revenga, C., Gronwall, J. and Fekete, B., 2011. Implications of fast urban growth for freshwater provision. Ambio, 40(5), p.437.

Mehta, L. and Karpouzoglou, T., 2015. Limits of policy and planning in peri-urban waterscapes: the case of Ghaziabad, Delhi, India. Habitat International, 48, pp.159-168.

Mekonnen, M.M. and Hoekstra, A.Y., 2016. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Science advances, 2(2), p.e1500323.

Mollinga, P.P., 2008. Water, politics and development: Framing a political sociology of water resources management. Water alternatives, 1(1), p.7.

Mweemba, C.E., Nyambe, I., Funder, M. and Van Koppen, B., 2010. Conflict and cooperation in local water governance: Inventory of local water-related events in Namwala District, Zambia (No. 2010: 15). DIIS working paper.

Ojha, H.R., 2008. Reframing governance: understanding deliberative politics in Nepal’s Terai forestry. Adroit Publishers.

Ranganathan, M., 2014. Paying for pipes, claiming citizenship: political agency and water reforms at the urban periphery. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(2), pp. 590-608.

Rodríguez-Labajos, B. and Martínez-Alier, J., 2015. Political ecology of water conflicts. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2(5), pp.537-558.

Simler, K., & Dudwik, N., 2010. Urbanization and rural-urban welfare inequalities. World Bank. [online] Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPOVERTY/ Resources/060310_Simler_Dudwick_Rural-Urban_Welfare_Inequalities.pdf

Slaymaker, T. and Bain, R., 2017. Access to drinking water around the world–In five infographics. The guardian.

Sunam, R.K., Banjade, M.R., Paudel, N.S., and Khatri, D., 2010. Can bureaucratic control improve community foestry governance? An analysis of proposed Forest Act amendment. Forestry Nepal. Discussion Paper Series 10.

Swatuk, L.A. and Wirkus, L., 2009. Transboundary water governance in southern Africa: an introduction. In Transboundary Water Governance in Southern Africa (pp. 11-30). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.

Swyngedouw, E. and Heynen, N.C., 2003. Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35(5), pp.898-918.

Swyngedouw, E., 2006. Circulations and metabolisms: (hybrid) natures and (cyborg) cities. Science as culture, 15(2), pp.105-121.

Swyngedouw, E., 2009. The political economy and political ecology of the hydro-social cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, pp.56–60.

Swyngedouw, E., Kaïka, M. and Castro, E., 2002. Urban water: a political-ecology perspective. Built Environment (1978) 28, pp.124–137. https://doi.org/10.2979/ philmusieducrevi.22.2.188?ref=no-x route:68243f4e63f6d6d455903d59638c794b

UN Water, 2018, Water scarcity, [online] Available at: <http://www.unwater.org/water- facts/scarcity/>.

Upreti, B.R., 2004. Resource conflicts and conflict resolution in Nepal. Mountain research and development, 24(1), pp.60-67.

Upreti, B.R., Dierolf, T.S., Krain, E., Kramer, E., Tarmudji, M.S. and Nasution, A., 1999. 95a. Managing local conflicts over water resources: a case study from Nepal. Overseas Development Institute.

Vij, S., Narain, V., Karpouzoglou, T. and Mishra, P., 2018. From the core to the periphery: conflicts and cooperation over land and water in peri-urban Gurgaon, India. Land Use Policy, 76, pp.382-390.

WaterAid in Nepal, 2012. Water source conflict in Nepal: a right to water perspective, Water Aid in Nepal.

Wolf, A.T., Yoffe, S.B. and Giordano, M., 2003. International waters: identifying basins at risk. Water policy, 5(1), pp.29-60.

Zeitoun, M. and Allan, J.A., 2008. Applying hegemony and power theory to transboundary water analysis. Water Policy, 10(S2), pp.3-12.

Zeitoun, M. and Mirumachi, N., 2008. Transboundary water interaction I: reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), p.297.

Zeitoun, M. and Warner, J., 2006. Hydro-hegemony–a framework for analysis of trans- boundary water conflicts. Water policy, 8(5), pp.435-460.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-18

How to Cite

“Water Conflicts in Urbanizing Regions in the Himalaya: Case Studies from Dhulikhel and Bidur in Nepal” (2018) New Angle: Nepal journal of social science and public policy, 5(1), pp. 49–73. doi:10.53037/na.v5i1.13.

Most read articles by the same author(s)