Rethinking Group-Based Development Approach in Nepal: Ways Forward

Authors

  • Stuty Maskey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53037/na.v3i1.27

Keywords:

community development;, group model;, social mobilisation;, development approach

Abstract

Over the last few decades, the role of ‘group-formation’ for community development has drawn substantial interest from policy makers, academics and development practitioners. This paper aims to examine the growing popularity of these development groups especially in the context where ‘groups’ are now the common entry point in most development programmes and projects in Nepal. The increasing popularity of the group approach, however, brings attention to some important questions. Is group formation a sin-qua-non for community development? Does group mobilisation always work out as per expectation? The purpose of this paper is not to provide a complete alternate option to the group approach but rather raise a note of caution on why excessive reliance on this approach must be viewed cautiously. By highlighting some issues related to this approach, this paper claims that although groups formed for community development have great potential, they should not be viewed as a panacea for developing communities; instead they should be viewed as an important component in tackling developmental challenges.

 

References

Bandyopadhyay, S., 2008. Microfinance in the improvement of living standard and GNH. In: Towards global transformation: proceedings of the third international conference on Gross National Happiness (pp.248-271). Thimpu: The Centre for Bhutan Studies. Available at: <http://www.bhutanstudies.org.bt/category/conference-proceedings/> [Accessed 10 November 2012].

Baas, S., 1997. The concept of participatory institutional development, paper presented at the International academic exchange conference on sustainable agriculture and sand control. Gansu Desert Area, China, 3-8 November.

Bigg, S., Gurung, S. & Messerschimidt, D., 2004. An exploratory study of gender, social inclusion and empowerment through development groups and group-based organisations in Nepal: building on the positive. Report Submitted to the Gender and Social Exclusion Assessment (GSEA) Study. Kathmandu: National Planning Commission, The World Bank and DFID.

Brown, W., 1990. Organised interests and their issue niches: a search for pluralism in a policy domain. Journal of Politics, 52(2), pp.477–509.

Cornwall, A. & Celestine, M., 2004. Putting the rights-based approach to development into perspective. Third World Quarterly, 25(8), pp.1415–37.

Decentralised Local Governance Support Programme (DLGSP), 2009. Social mobilisation in Nepal – a way out of poverty. Available at: < www.undp.org.np/ uploads/.../2010110410264299.pdf > [Accessed November 26 2012].

Government of Nepal (GoN), 1999. The Local Self Governance Act, 1999. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal. Available at: <http://www.mofald.gov.np/userfiles/docs_9. pdf>.

Iversen, V., Chhetry, B., Francis, P., Gurung, M., Kafle, G., Pain, A. & Seeley, J., 2006. Hidden economies and elite capture: evidence from forest user groups in Nepal’s Terai. High Value Forests, 58(1), pp.93–107.

Local Governance and Community Development Programme (LGCDP), 2008. Local Governance and Community Development Programme. Available at: www.lgcdp.gov. np/home/about_lgcdp.php [Accessed 15 September 2012].

Ministry of Local Development (MLD), 2010. Social Mobilisation Guideline, 2010. Kathmandu: Ministry of Local Development.

Pandolfelli, L., Meinzen-Dick, S. & Dohm, S., 2007. Gender and collective action: a conceptual framework for analysis, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Available at <http://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/worpps/64.html> [Accessed 12 November 2012].

Razavi, S., 2002. Shifting burdens: gender and agrarian change under neoliberalism. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.

Reddy, C. S. & Manak, S., 2005. Self-help groups: a keystone of microfinance in India- women empowerment & social security. Hyderabad: Andhra Pradesh Mahila Abhivruddhi Society (APMAS).

Sanyal, B., 1996. The myth of development from below. Unpublished paper as part of forthcoming book, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Satterthwaite, D. & Sauter, G., 2008. Understanding and supporting the role of local organisations in sustainable development. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

Stringfellow, R., Coulter, J., Lucey, T., McKone C. & Hussain, A., 1997. Improving the access of smallholders to agricultural services in sub-Saharan Africa: farmer cooperation and the role of the donor community. ODI Natural Resource Perspectives 20. Available at:<http://www.odi.org/publications/2137-improving-access- smallholders-agricultural-services-sub-saharan-africa-farmer-cooperation-role- donor-community> .

Thorp, R., Stewart, F. & Heyer, A., 2005. When and how far is group formation a route out of chronic poverty? World Development, 33(6), pp.907–20.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2002. Nepal Human Development Report 2001, Kathmandu: UNDP.

Van Heck, B., 2003. Participatory development: guidelines on beneficiary participation in agricultural and rural development. Rome: Rural Institutions and Participation Service, Rural Development Division, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.

Wijayaratna, C. ed., 2004. Role of local communities and institutions in integrated rural development, Asian productivity Organisation. Report of the APO Seminar on Role of Local Communities and Institutions in Integrated Rural Development held in Islamic Republic of Iran, 15-20 June 2002. Available at: <http://www.apo-tokyo.org/ publications/files/pjrep-icd-se-3-01.pdf>.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-05

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES

How to Cite

“Rethinking Group-Based Development Approach in Nepal: Ways Forward” (2014) New Angle: Nepal journal of social science and public policy, 3(1), pp. 49–64. doi:10.53037/na.v3i1.27.