Incentives for Securing Water in a Himalayan town: A case from Dhulikhel, Nepal

Authors

  • Tikeshwari Joshi Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies
  • Eszter K. Kovacs Department of Geography, University of Cambridge UK, and Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary.
  • Kaustuv Raj Neupane Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53037/na.v6i1.5

Keywords:

Incentives, negotiation, actors, ecosystem services, water security

Abstract

This paper explores the negotiations and the emerging socio-political relationships and alliances that were formed to reach a series of water-sharing agreements between upstream and downstream communities, in order to secure water required for continued urbanisation of the downstream town. The research focused on the socio-political actors and users of the Dhulikhel drinking water supply system of Nepal. Primary data was collected through key informant interviews, focus group discussions and stakeholder workshops to explore the development of the negotiation process and the agreement, and the role of different actors. The qualitative data was analysed through narrative and discourse analyses. During the negotiation process, political leaders from both communities were involved in the formation and acceptance of the agreement. The long-term negotiation that started during the 1980s culminated in a series of agreements, the last of which formally introduced cash incentives to the upstream community in 2011. The downstream urban community has been paying NPR one million per annum to the upstream community for their continued role in the sustainable management of the water catchment. The paper provides insights into the shifting power relations between local rural and urban socio-political actors who play a vital role in water access negotiations, and fundamentally influence the potentials and effectiveness of incentive-based mechanisms to secure water needs.

References

Alfredson, T. and Cungu, A., 2008. Negotiation theory and practice: a review of the literature. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, FAO.

Bhatta, L.D., Helmuth van Oort, B.E., Rucevska, I. and Baral, H., 2014. Payment for ecosystem services: possible instrument for managing ecosystem services in Nepal. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 10(4), pp.289-299.

CBS, 2012. National population and housing census 2011. Central Bureau of Statistics, Kathmandu, Government of Nepal.

Chan, K.M.A., Anderson, E., Chapman, M., Jespersen, K. and Olmsted, P., 2017. Payments for ecosystem services: rife with problems and potential—for transformation towards sustainability. Ecological Economics, 140, pp.110–122.

Corbera, E., Kosoy, N. and Tuna, M.M., 2007. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change, 17(3-4), pp.365-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2006.12.005

Corbera, E., Soberanis, C.G. and Brown, K., 2009. Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics, 68(3), pp.743-761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008

Cosgrove, W.J. and Loucks, D.P., 2015. Water management: current and future challenges and research directions. Water Resources Research, 51(6), pp.4823-4839.

Dhulikhel Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Users’ Committee. 2014.Annual Report.

Dhulikhel Municipality, 2011. Municipal profile of Dhulikhel 2011. Kavre, Nepal.

de Groot, R.B.A. and Hermans L.M., 2009. Broadening the picture: negotiating payment schemes for water-related environmental services in the Netherlands, Ecological Economics, 68(11), pp.2760-2767.

Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. and Stern, P.C., 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), pp.1907-1912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015

Dore, J., Robinson, J. and Smith, M. eds., 2010. Negotiate – reaching agreements over water. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

Francisco, J.C.R., 2013. PES, peasants and power in Andean watersheds: power relations and payment for environmental services in Colombia and Ecuador. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL. ISBN 978-94-6173-786-1.

Gutman, P., 2007. Ecosystem services: foundations for a new rural-urban Ccmpact. Ecol Econ, 62:383–p.387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.027

Hope, R.A., Porras, I., Borgoyar, M., Miranda, M., Agarwal, C., Tiwari, S. and Amezaga, J.M., 2007. Negotiating watershed services. Water Resources Markets for Environmental Series, London.

Huang, M., Upadhyaya S.K., Jindal, R. and Kerr, J., 2009. Payments for watershed services in Asia: a review of current initiatives. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28 (2009), pp.551- 575.

IPBES, 2018. Intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES).

Creed, I.F. and van Noordwijk, M. eds., 2018. Forest and water on a changing planet: vulnerability, adaptation and governance opportunities. A global Assessment Report, IUFRO World Series Vol 38. Vienna.

Jack, B.K., Kousky, C. and Sims, K.R.E., 2008. Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(28), pp.9465-9470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705503104

Joshi, T., Devkota, K. and Neupane, K., 2014. Incentive based natural resources management for securing water needs in the face of climate change: a case study of Dhulikhel water users committee, Nepal. International Conference on Mountain People Adapting to Change. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Joshi, T., Agarwal, C. and Neupane, K., 2018. Water catchments and water users: negotiations and other mechanisms for water security in the urbanising Himalayas, Social Science Baha.

Khatri, D.B., 2009. Compromising the environment in payments for environmental services? An institutional analysis of mechanisms for sharing hydroelectricity revenue in Kulekhani watershed, Nepal. MA Thesis. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.

Kosoy, N., Martinez-Tuna, M., Muradian, R. and Alier J.M., 2007. Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61, pp.446–455.

Kolinjivadi, V., Adamowski, J. and Kosoy, N., 2014. Recasting payments for ecosystem services (PES) in water resource management: a novel institutional approach. Ecosystem Services, 10, pp.144-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.008.

Kumar, S. and Managi, S., 2009. Compensation for environmental services and intergovernmental fiscal transfers: the case of India. Ecol Econ, 68, pp.3052–3059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.009.

Kovacs, E.K., Kumar, C., Agarwal, C., Adams, W.M., Hope, R.A. and Vira, B., 2016. The politics of negotiation and implementation: a reciprocal water access agreement in the Himalayan foothills, India. Ecology and Society, 21(2), p.37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08462-210237.

Martinez, R., Green, K.M. and Dewan, A., 2013. Establishing reciprocal agreements for water and biodiversity conservation through a social marketing campaign in Quanda Watershed, Peru. Conservation Evidence, 10, pp.42-47.

Meinzen-Dick, R., 2007. Beyond panaceas in water institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), pp.15200-15205.https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.0702296104

Mollinga, P.P., 2008. Water, politics and development: framing a political sociology of water resources management. Water Alternatives, 1(1), pp.7-23.

Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N. and May, P., 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payment for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69, pp.1202-1208.

Muradian, R. and Rival, L., 2012. Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 1(1):93–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009.

MoUD Nepal, 2015. Water Service Providers Data Book, 2013-2014. Sector Efficiency Improvement Unit (SEIU), Ministry of Urban Development, Nepal.

MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.

Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A. and Platais, G., 2005. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development, 33(2), pp.237-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. worlddev.2004.07.011.

Pagiola, S., 2008. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 65, pp.712-724.

Pascual, U., Phelps, J., Garmendia, E., Brown, K., Corbera, E., Martin, A., Gomez-Baggethun, E. and Muradian, R., 2014. Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services. BioScience, 64(11), 1027-1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu146.

Porras, I., Grieg-Gran, M. and Neves, N., 2008. All that glitters: a review of payments for watershed services in developing countries. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London.

Rai, R.K., Nepal, M., Bhatta, L.D., Das, S., Khadayat, M.S., Somanathan, E. and Baral, K., 2017. Ensuring water availability to water users through incentive payment for ecosystem services scheme: a case study in a small hilly town of Nepal. Water Econ. Policy, 1850002.

Rai R. K., Shyamsundar, P., Nepal, M. and Bhatta, L.D., 2018. Financing watershed services in the foothills of the Himalayas. Water, 10(7), 965.

Raik, D.B., Wilson, A.L., Decker, D.J., 2008. Power in natural resources management: an application of theory. Society & Natural Resources, 21, pp.729-739.

Rasul, G., Chettri, N. and Sharma, E., 2011. Framework for valuing ecosystem services in the Himalayas. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD).

Grêt-Regamey, A., Brunner, S.H. and Kienast, F., 2012. Mountain ecosystem Services: who cares? Mountain Research and Development (MRD), 32(S1): S23-S34. International Mountain Society (IMS).

Rode, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E. and Krause, T., 2015. Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: a review of the empirical evidence. Ecol. Econ, (117), pp.270–282.

SDG, 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development.

Thapa, G.B. and Paudel, G.S., 2002. Farmland degradation in the mountains of Nepal: a study of watersheds ‘with’ and ‘without’ external intervention. Land Degrad. Dev, 13, pp.479–493.

Tiwari, P.C., Tiwari, A. and Joshi, B., 2018. Urban growth in Himalaya: understanding the process and options for sustainable development. Journal of Urban and Regional Studies on Contemporary India, 4(2), pp.15–27.

Uprety, D.R., 2006. Conflicts in natural resource management – examples from community forestry. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie, 15, pp.143-155. Available online: www.boku.ac.at/oega.

Uprety D.R., 2007. Community forestry, rural livelihoods and conflict: a case study of community forest users’ groups in Nepal. Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, 64, ISBN 978-3-900782-59-7.

Van Hecken, G., Bastiaensen, J. and Windey, C., 2015. Towards a power-sensitive and socially informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): addressing the gaps in the current debate. Ecological Economics, 120, pp.117–125. https://doi:10.1016/j. ecolecon.2015.10.012.

van Noordwijk, M., Galudra, G., Leimona, B. and Villamor, G. B., 2008. Dealing with myth perceptions: how to reduce communication and perception gaps before rewards for environmental services negotiations can start? RUPES Synthesis Notes No. 1. The World Agroforestry Centre, South East Asia Regional Office, Bogor, Indonesia.

Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Occasional Paper No. 42.

Wunder, S., 2007. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conserv. Biol, 21, pp.48–58.

Wunder, S., Engel, S. and Pagiola, S., 2008. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics, 65, pp.834-852.

Wunder, S., 2013. When payments for environmental services will work for conservation. Conservation Letters, (6), pp.230–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12034.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-21

How to Cite

“Incentives for Securing Water in a Himalayan town: A case from Dhulikhel, Nepal” (2019) New Angle: Nepal journal of social science and public policy, 6(1), pp. 66–85. doi:10.53037/na.v6i1.5.