Rural migrant labourers and their livelihood during COVID-19 in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53037/kdn57115Keywords:
COVID-19, livelihood, migrant labourer, rural citizens, stigmaAbstract
The global crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to severe economic, social, and cultural impacts. In India, it has uncovered the harsh reality of the rural migrant labourers, by exposing the risks of their working and living conditions and the chronic homelessness they face in the city. The sudden enforcement of the lockdowns during the pandemic intensified the pre-existing vulnerabilities of the rural migrant labourer force living in the cities. Homeless and forced to return to their villages, the rural migrant workers and their families faced yet another form of marginalisation in their native hometowns as ‘vectors’ of the disease.
In light of this context, this paper attempts to explore and understand the experience of migrant labourers during COVID-19 towards issues concerning their livelihood, health, social security, and their experiences of stigma. Furthermore, it also delves into finding the kinds of alternative strategies adopted by the State to resolve and care for these communities. This study critically looks into these aspects through primary empirically collected data, in Muda, a small remote village in Damoh district in the northern part of Madhya Pradesh, a socio-economically backward region of India, with the help of existing secondary information about the region and communities. The study identified that migrants faced significant food, shelter and security challenges at both their place of employment in the city as well as their hometown in the remote village of Muda.
References
Agrawal, S., 2016. Urban migration and social exclusion: Study from Indore slums and informal settlements. Working Paper. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) London, Retrieved from https:// pubs.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/10777IIED.pdf
Akinola, A., Indira K., Anil, K., and Chetapalli, S.K., 2014. Health Inequality for Internal Migrant labourers in India. An ethical perspective. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 11 (4), pp.232-237.
Aktinson, P., and Hammersley, M., 1998. Ethnography and participant observation. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.248-261.
Barnes, B., Bloor, D., and Henry, J., 1996. Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. A&C Black.
Bhattacharya, P., Banerjee, D., and Rao, T. S., 2020. The “untold” side of COVID-19: Social stigma and its consequences in India. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 42(4), pp.382-386.
Bhavani, R. V., and Gopinath, R., 2020. The COVID19 pandemic crisis and the relevance of a farm-system-for-nutrition approach. Food security, 12(4), pp.881-884.
Deshingkar, P., and Akter, S., 2009. Migration and human development in India.
Deshingkar, P., 2008. Circular internal migration and development in India. Migration and development within and across borders: research and policy perspectives on internal and international migration. Geneva: International Organization for Migration/Social Science Research Council, pp.161-87.
Deshingkar, P., 2023. Cultural capital and constrained agency in debt-migration for construction work in India. Cultural Studies, 37(4), pp.605-625.
Dutta, M., 2020. Gendered migration: Does the better world exist? Economic and Political Weekly, 54 (49), pp.22-23.
Gilbert, P., 2016. Human nature and suffering. Routledge.
Guérin, I., 2013. Bonded labourer, agrarian changes and capitalism: Emerging Patterns in South India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(3), pp.405–423.
Gupta, A. K., Nair, S.S., Ghosh, O., Singh, A. and Dey, S., 2014. Bundelkhand Drought: Retrospective analysis and way ahead. National Institute of Disaster Management, New Delhi, 148.
Iyer, M., 2020. Migration in India and the impact of lockdown on migrants. PRS Legislative Research, June 10. Retrieved from https://www.prsindia.org/ theprsblog/migration-India-and-impact-lockdown-migrants.
Jesline, J., Romate, J., Rajkumar, E., and George, A. J. 2021. The plight of migrants during COVID-19 and the impact of circular migration in India: A systematic review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1).
Jodhka, S.S., 2014. Emergent ruralities: Revisiting village life and agrarian change in Haryana. Economic and Political Weekly, pp.5-17.
Jodhka, S.S. and Kumar, A., 2017. Non-farm economy in Madhubani, Bihar: Social dynamics and exclusionary rural transformations. Economic and Political Weekly, pp.14-24.
Jones, K, Mudaliar, S., and Piper, N., 2021. Locked down and in limbo: The global impact of COVID-19 on migrant worker rights and recruitment. International LabourOrganization.
Junankar, P.N., and Shonchoy, A., 2013. The informal labourer market in India: Transitory or permanent employment for migrants? IZA discussion papers no. 7587. Bonn: Institute
Keshri, K., and Bhagat, R. B., 2012. Temporary and seasonal migration: Regional pattern, characteristics and associated factors. Economic and Political Weekly, pp.81-88.
Kumar, S., 2016. Agrarian transformation and the new rurality in Western Uttar Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, pp.61-71.
Mishra, A. S. I. M. A., and Sayeed, D. N. 2020. Covid-19 and migrant workers: Clinical psychologists’ viewpoints. In: L.S.S. Manickam eds. 2020. COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and responses of psychologists from India. P.43.Centre for Applied Psychological Studies, Thiruvananthapuram. Ch.5.
Narayanan, S., 2020. Becoming a young farmer in Madhya Pradesh, India (No. 2020-040). WORKING PAPER Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
Niti Aayog, 2012. Human Development Report, Bundelkhand
Paltashingh, T. and Bhue, P., 2021. Labour migration and Exclusion: India’s experience during COVID-19 Pandemic. Social Action, 71(2) pp.138-151.
Perspectives, 2010. Drought by design: the man-made calamity in Bundelkhand. Economic and Political Weekly, pp.33-38.
Prakash, A., and Borker, H., 2022. Pandemic Precarity. in India, 57(5), p.40.
Reddy, D. N., and Mishra, S., Eds.. 2010. Agrarian crisis in India. Oxford University Press.
Rukmini, S., 2020. How COVID-19 locked out women from jobs. Livemint.
Sen, A., 1984. The living standard. Oxford Economic Papers, 36, pp.74-90.
Sharma, G. D., Thomas, A., and Paul, J., 2021. Reviving tourism industry post-COVID-19: A resilience-based framework. Tourism Management Perspectives, 37, p.100786.
Shiva, V., 2015. Soil not Oil: Environmental Justice in an age of climate crisis. North Atlantic Books.
Srivastava, S., 2020. Return to the city or struggle in village? Migrant workers who fled lockdown are in a bind. ThePrint [online]. New Delhi. https://theprint.in/india/return-to-the-city-or-struggle-in-village-migrant-workers-who-fledlockdown-are-in-a-bind/450627/)
Stranded Workers Action Network (SWAN)., 2020a. 21 days and counting: Covid-19 lockdown, migrant workers, and the inadequacy of welfare measures in India, Stranded Workers Action Network, April
Symon, G. E., and Cassell, C. E., 1998. Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide. Sage Publications Ltd.
UN-HABITAT., 2013. State of the world’s cities 2012/2013 prosperities of cities. Nairobi, United Nation Human Settlement Programme. Nairobi, New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/download-manager
Vasavi, A R., 2021. Adverse integration of Rural India. Seminar, 2021
Vasuniya, V and Rajak, D., 2021. Tribal livelihood during the pandemic (Unpublished paper), Presented in a Conference at Arizona State University.
Verschuren, P., 2003. Case study as a research strategy: Some ambiguities and opportunities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(2), pp.121-139.
World Bank., 2020. Covid-19 Crisis Through A Migration Lens. [Online]. Available at:. (://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ handle/10986/33634).
Yadav, Y., 2020. Don’t blame covid for financial package. Politics is holding india’s migrant workers hostage. May 6. Retrieved from https://theprint.in/ opinion/politics-holding-India-migrant-workers-hostage/415524/.
Yin, R. K., 2003. Designing case studies. Qualitative research methods, 5(14), pp.359-386.
