Understanding forces of resistance in gender mainstreaming in Nepal’s forest bureaucracy

Authors

  • Srijana Shrestha President Chure Terai Madhesh Conservation Development Board, Lalitpur, Nepal
  • Sushma Giri President Chure Terai Madhesh Conservation Development Board, Lalitpur, Nepal
  • Pragati Sharma Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies, Nepal
  • Saraswati Aryal Ministry of Forests and Environment, Bagmati Province, Nepal
  • Prativa Sapkota University of Melbourne, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53037/na.v9i1.118

Keywords:

Forestry organisation, Gender mainstreaming, Institutional resistance, Policy

Abstract

Mainstreaming gender in Nepal’s forestry sector policies, institutions, and practices commenced as a response to the recognition of gender-based inequalities. The development of community forestry and national political changes over recent decades has facilitated a wider discussion on equity and justice, encouraging policy reforms. In this paper, we examine whether and how policies, strategies and institutions are challenging the status quo within the forest bureaucracy. More importantly, we identify forces of resistance that hinder effective implementation of gender-inclusive policies. The insights presented in this paper are based on data collected through central- and district-level workshops, document analysis, interviews, and direct observations. Based on the assessment at different levels, it is explicit that current efforts in the forestry sector to mainstream gender in policies, institutions and practices are limited. Policy changes indicate a progressive move towards mainstreaming gender to a certain extent while efforts to enable implementation of such policies are inadequate. For instance, a lack of institutional adaptation and organisational restructuring have hindered the effective implementation of these policies. Challenges identified at both central and district levels reflect broader socio-cultural norms deeply embedded in Nepal’s patriarchal society. One of the key recommendations of this study is the need for structural changes, such as radical institutional and organisational reforms, to drive transformational behavioural change. Additionally, other recommendations include revisiting existing policies, approving the GESI strategy, preparing an actionable implementation plan, and strengthening mechanisms for monitoring and law enforcement.

References

Agarwal, B. (2010) Gender and green governance: The political economy of women’s presence within and beyond community forestry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Agócs, C. (1997) ‘Institutionalized resistance to organizational change: Denial, inaction and repression’, Journal of Business Ethics, 16, pp. 917-931.

Arora-Jonsson, S. (2014) ‘Forty years of gender research and environmental policy: Where do we stand?’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 47, pp. 295–308.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.02.009

Baral, S., Shrestha, K.K. and Tiwari, S. (2024) ‘Persistence of women’s exclusion in Nepal’s community forestry practice’, Geoforum, 155.

Benschop, Y. and Verloo, M. (2006) ‘Sisyphus’ sisters: Can gender mainstreaming escape the genderedness of organizations?’, Journal of Gender studies, 15(1), pp. 19-33.

Bhattarai, B. (2011) Rhetoric and reality: Enacting gender-based inclusion in managing the commons in Nepal. https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/7303/134.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed on 23rd December 2023.

Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (2003) ‘Symbolic violence’, in Célestin, R., DalMolin, E. and Courtivron, I. (eds.) Beyond French feminisms: Debates on women, culture and politics in France 1980-2001. Palgrave Macmillan New York, pp. 272–274.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2019) ‘Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis’, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), pp. 589-597.

Brouwers, R. (2013) Revisiting gender mainstreaming in international development: Goodbye to an illusionary strategy. ISS Working Paper No. 556, pp. 1-36.

Byrne, D. (2005) ‘Complexity, configurations and cases’, Theory, culture & society, 22(5), pp. 95-111.

Chhetri, R.B. et al. (2008) Decentralization and promotion of women’s Rights in Nepal: Exploring constraints, opportunities and intervention avenues. Forest Action Nepal and International Development and Research Centre.

Christie, M.E. and Giri, K. (2011) ‘Challenges and experiences of women in the Forestry sector in Nepal’, International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 3(5), pp. 139-146.

Colfer, C.J.P. (2013) The gender box: A framework for analysing gender roles in forest management. Indonesia: CIFOR.

Daly, M. (2005) ‘Gender mainstreaming in theory and practice’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(3), pp. 433-450.

New Angle 2024

Downloads

Published

2025-05-09

How to Cite

“Understanding forces of resistance in gender mainstreaming in Nepal’s forest bureaucracy” (2025) New Angle: Nepal journal of social science and public policy, 9(1), pp. 41–60. doi:10.53037/na.v9i1.118.