Strengthening women’s economic empowerment: The post-COVID re-opening of the weekly market through participatory action research and deliberative forums in western Nepal

Authors

  • Sushant Acharya Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies
  • Mani Ram Banjade Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies
  • Anushiya Shrestha Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies
  • Meeta Sainju Pradhan Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53037/na.v9i1.103

Keywords:

economic empowerment, gender constraints, market access, women farmers

Abstract

The haat, an open-air traditional marketplace, provides small farmers with access to markets where they can sell their products. These economic spaces are particularly important for women farmers, whose access to distant markets is limited amidst persisting gender-based constraints including mobility restrictions and security concerns. Beyond direct economic benefits, haats also serve as social spaces for women to connect with other farmers and exchange information. However, one such market (haat), operating twice a week in Sandhikharka, Arghakhanchi district for the past four decades, was closed during the COVID-19 pandemic and remained closed even after other restrictions were lifted. This prompted our participatory action research team to investigate the causes and consequences of its prolonged closure and to facilitate efforts to reopen it. In collaboration with the local government, the research institution organised deliberative forums where relevant stakeholders collectively identified the key constraints to reopening the haat and developed strategies for its revival. Ongoing efforts are focused on institutionalising the haat and ensuring its sustainable operation. In this paper, we outline the process followed and share insights generated from the research and engagement conducted during the reopening effort. Women smallholder farmers have expressed their appreciation for the reopening, noting that the haat is crucial not only for securing better prices for their produce but also for significantly reducing the challenges of selling their products elsewhere, while encouraging further economic activities and contributing to their economic empowerment. 

References

Baum, F., MacDougall, C. and Smith, D. (2006) 'Participatory action research', Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(10), p. 854.

Bergman, L.J. et al. (2019) ‘Gendered mobilities and immobilities: Women’s and men’s capacities for agricultural innovation in Kenya and Nigeria’, Gender, Place & Culture, 26(12), pp. 1759-1783.

Bhusal, S., Acharya, S. and Banjade, M.R. (2024) Women defend their rights and incomes: Lessons from Nepali farmers, 7th March. Climate and Development Knowledge Network. Available at: https://glowprogramme.org/news-blogs/women-defend-their-rights-and-incomes-lessons-nepali-farmers

Borda, O.F. (2006) ‘Participatory (action) research in social theory: Origins and challenges’, in Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds.) Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. SAGE Publications, pp. 27-37.

Bovaird, T. and Loeffler, E. (2016) ‘What has co-production ever done for interactive governance?’, in Jurian, E. and Ingmar van, M. (eds.) Critical reflections on interactive governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 254-277.

Chevalier, J.M. and Buckles, D.J. (2019) Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. Second edition. London: Routledge.

Dryzek, J.S. (2010) Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. New York : Oxford University Press Inc.

Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2005) ‘Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere’, in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. Third edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 559–604.

Mansbridge, J. et al. (2012) ‘A systemic approach to deliberative democracy’, in Parkinson J. and Mansbridge J. (eds.) Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-26.

Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2008) Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry & practice. 2nd edn. London: SAGE.

Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M. and Howlett, M. (2018) ‘Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool’, Policy and Society, 37(3), pp. 277–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676

Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies [SIAS] (2023). Third technical report of the project Co-producing a Shock-resilient Business Ecosystem for Women-led Enterprises in Nepal. Kathmandu: SIAS.

UKAID (2020). Vegetable Sector Strategy – Nepal. Commercial Agriculture for Smallholders and Agribusiness Nepal Country Team.

Strengthening women’s economic empowerment: The post-COVID re-opening of the weekly market through participatory action research and deliberative forums in western Nepal

Downloads

Published

2025-02-04

How to Cite

“Strengthening women’s economic empowerment: The post-COVID re-opening of the weekly market through participatory action research and deliberative forums in western Nepal” (2025) New Angle: Nepal journal of social science and public policy, 9(1). doi:10.53037/na.v9i1.103.