INCLUSIVE POLICIES, EXCLUSIONARY PRACTICES: UNFOLDING THE PARADOX OF PROLONGED URBAN INFORMALITY DEBATES IN URBANISING NEPAL

Authors

  • Anushiya Shrestha
  • Dilli P. Poudel
  • Jonathan Ensor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53037/na.v7i1.66

Keywords:

contradicting policies, inconsistent practices, informal settlers, politicising informality, risks, urban informality

Abstract

Social inclusion and poverty alleviation are central to the United Nations (UN) new urban agenda and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially Goal 11 on sustainable cities and communities. In Nepal, the goal of the National Urban Agenda is to “make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, sustainable and smart to enhance their ability to provide decent jobs and adequate housing, infrastructure and services to the ever-growing urban population”. Against this backdrop, many international and national non-governmental organisations and the national federations of informal settlers in Nepal have been advocating for the rights of urban informal settlers to be included in the urban planning processes. In response, the Nepal government has formulated new policies to assess the “authenticity” of informal settlers and accelerate the informal to formal transition process. Drawing from the textual analysis of existing national policies, literature and media publications, in this paper, we document what (dis)connections and contradictions exist in the formal policies and interventions that the national government has designed for addressing urban informality issue and how they frame urban informality issues and the solutions to manage the same. Our analysis shows that although government policies are rhetorically inclusive and progressive, indicating a desire to resolve informality issues, policies issued by different ministries and departments are disconnected. We also find that the practices often contradict the policies, and attempts to secure transitions to formality are undermined by a failure to recognise the legitimate stake that informal settlers have in the process. We conclude by discussing how these contradictions and inconsistencies can potentially be redirected towards socially just urban transition and suggesting ways forward for addressing the protracted urban informality issue in Nepal.

Author Biographies

  • Anushiya Shrestha

    Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies (SIAS), Kathmandu, Nepal.

  • Dilli P. Poudel

    Southasia Institute of Advanced Studies (SIAS), Kathmandu, Nepal.

  • Jonathan Ensor

    Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York, U.K.

References

Adhikari, J., 2008. Land Reform in Nepal: Problems and prospects. Action Aid.

Amnesty International Nepal (AI Nepal), Community Self Reliance Centre (CSRC)-Nepal and Justice and Rights Institute (JuRI)-Nepal., 2019. Nepal: land for landless peasants comments and recommendations on amendment to the Lands Act 1964.

Auerbach, A.M. and Thachil, T., 2018. How clients select brokers: Competition and choice in India’s slums. American Political Science Review, pp.1-17.

Bryman, A., 2012. Social research methods. 4th ed. Oxford University Press.

Brooks, R., 2016. Relocation, resistance and resilience: Squatter community responses to government intervention for urban development in Kathmandu. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, 2505. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2505

DWIDP, 2009. The preparation of flood risk vulnerability map of the Kathmandu Valley. Department of Water Induced Disaster Prevention (DWIDP), Full Bright Consultancy, and Geo Consult JV. Unpublished report.

Carrasco, S. and Dangol, N., 2019. Residents’ self-initiatives for flood adaptation in informal riverbank settlements of Kathmandu. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. DOI. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101156

CBS, 2011. Nepal Living Standard Survey III, 2010/11. Central Bureau of Statistics, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu.

Dangol, N. and Day, J., 2017. Flood adaptation by informal settlers in Kathmandu and their fear of eviction. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 7(2), pp.147-156.

Deuskar, C., 2019. Clientelism and planning in the informal settlements of developing democracies. Journal of Planning Literature, pp.1-13.

Ellis, P. and Roberts, M., 2016. Leveraging urbanization in South Asia: Managing spatial transformation for prosperity and livability. Washington DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.

Farnan, R. Ensor, J., Shrestha A., Poudel D.P., forthcoming. Contesting urban informality: Hegemonic discourses, knowledge infrastructures, and political capability (under review).

Fernandes, E., 2011. Regularization of informal settlements in Latin America. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, USA.

Fraser, N., 1997. Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “Postsocialist” condition. New York: Routledge.

Fraser, N. and Honneth, A., 2003. Redistribution or recognition? A political philosophical exchange. Verso Books.

Gallagher, K., 2016. The discourse of power and the politics of squatting in Nepal. Crossing the Border: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4 (1/15)

Ghimire, B. 2021. Land to landless is more political than a socioeconomic issue, The Kathmandu Post [online] 16 September. Available at: https://kathmandupost.com/national/2021/09/16/land-to-landless-is-more-political-than-a-socioeconomic-issue.

Ghimire, C. 2021. Another municipal atrocity on squatters brought to Tent by dozer (with video), [online] May 24. Available at: https://www.nayapatrikadaily.com/news-details/64640/2021-05-24?fbclid=IwAR16HwCoe-_Nwiic49JngXfzIEqKDo6jBCDUiyYJzQ-5vHBuD9BQHRdc6lU [Accessed on 29 May 2021].

GoN and ADB, 2010. Safer and affordable housing for urban poor: A case for Kathmandu Valley. Government of Nepal and Asian Development Bank.

GoN/NTNC, 2009. Bagmati Action Plan (2009-2014). Government of Nepal and National Trust for Nature Conservation.

Constitution of Nepal, 2015. Kathmandu: Nepal Law Commission

GoN, 2017. Local Government Operation Act, 2017. Government of Nepal.

GoN, 2020. The Land related (Eighth Amendment) Act 2020. Government of Nepal.

GoN, 2018. The Right to Housing Act 2018. Government of Nepal.

GoN, 2019. Poverty Alleviation Policy 2019. Government of Nepal.

Hamrakura, 2020. Preparing to distribute up to 6 acres of land to squatters in Kathmandu, [online] 25 April. Available at: https://hamrakura.com/news-details/77641/2020-04-25. [Accessed on 27 April 2020].

Hasan, A., Ahmed, N., Raza, M., Sadiq, A., ud Din Ahmed, S. and Sarwar, M.B., 2013. Land ownership, control and contestation in Karachi and implications for low-income housing. Urbanization and Emerging Population Issues. Working Paper 10 (International Institute for Environment and Development United Nations Population Fund) https://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/10625IIED.pdf.

K.C., N., 2015. Including low-income plots in land pooling: A case of Icchangu Narayan land pooling project, Kathmandu, Nepal. M.Sc thesis., Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

Karki, A. K., 2002. Movements from below: Land rights movement in Nepal. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 3(2), pp.201-217, DOI: 10.1080/1464937022000000129.

Khatiwada, P.P., 2012. Nepal domestication of treaties what about implementation? Review Report, National Alliance for Human Rights and Social Justice-Nepal (Human Rights Alliance).

KVDA, 2016. Vision 2035 and beyond: 20 years strategic development master plan (2015 - 2035) for Kathmandu Valley. Kathmandu Valley Development Authority, Ministry of Urban Development, Government of Nepal.

KVDA, 2015. Risk sensitive land use plan of Kathmandu Valley. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Urban Development, Kathmandu Valley Development Authority, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Nepal, Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management Programme.

Landell Mills Ltd and Jeremy Benn Associates Ltd (JBA), 2019. Nepal: Flood risk sector assessment, Consultant Report for Asian Development Bank (ADB) TA 9634-REG: Strengthening Integrated Flood Risk Management, ADB.

Lueger, M. and Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H.P., 1994. Hermeneutic interpretation in qualitative research: Between art and rules. In: I. Borg, & P.P. Mohler, Eds. Trends and perspectives in empirical social research, pp.294-307. Berlin: de Gruyter. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-6056

Lumanti, 2002. Shadows of development: housing the urban poor (An experience from Vishnumati link road project). Kathmandu: Lumanti Support Group for Shelter.

Lumanti, 2005. New beginnings: Housing for the urban poor. A Case study of Kirtipur Housing Project. Kathmandu: Lumanti Support Group for Shelter.

Lumanti, 2008. Status of squatter communities along Bagmati River and its tributaries in Kathmandu Valley. Kathmandu: Lumanti Support Group for Shelter.

Mathur, O.P., 2014. Urban Poverty in Asia. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank (ADB).

MoLCPA, 2020. Compendium of squatter problem resolution commissions work orders. Ministry of Land, Cooperatives and Poverty Alleviation.

MoLCPA, 2019. Poverty Alleviation Policy. Ministry of Land management, Cooperative and Poverty Alleviation.

MoUD, 2014. National Shelter Plan. Ministry of Urban Development.

MoUD, 2016. Inclusive cities: resilient communities. Third United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III) – Nepal National Report. Ministry of Urban Development, Kathmandu.

MoUD, 2017. National Urban Development Strategy 2017. Ministry of Urban Development, Government of Nepal.

MoUD, 2020. National Urban Policy, 2020 (Draft). Kathmandu: Ministry of Urban Development.

MoUD, 2012. National Shelter Policy, 2012. Kathmandu: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of Nepal.

Ninglekhu, S., 2012. Breaking open ‘civil society’; sukumbasi and the city. New Angle: Nepal Journal of Social Science and Public Policy, 2(1), published by Nepal Policy Research Network.

Ninglekhu, S., 2016. Mutable aspirations and uncertain futures: Everyday life and the politics of urgency in Kathmandu. PhD thesis.Department of Geography and Program, Planning University of Toronto.

Ninglekhu, S., 2017. ‘Inauthentic’ sukumbasi: The politics of aesthetics and urgency in Kathmandu. Himalaya, 37(1), pp. 2-83.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2018. Glossary of Statistical Terms. https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=1351.

Pandit, S., 2021. River-side settlements are being removed, dozers at Hanumante after Baneshwor, [online] February 16. Available at: https://www.nepalpress.com/2021/03/17/34118/?fbclid=IwAR2wPa_IzsWSyxfcR7t8AFkImrFknta34CR4irn9KimQBcy0vxV5_e18Lss;%20see%20also%20footnote%2012. [Accessed on 1 November 2021].

Patel, S. and Baptist, C., 2012. Editorial: Documenting by the undocumented. Environment & Urbanization, 24(1), pp.3–12. DOI: 10.1177/0956247812438364

Pokhrel, M., 2018. Landless squatters on the rise despite distributing 46 bighas of land. Available at: https://cijnepal.org.np/landless-squatters-on-the-rise-despite-distributing-46-bighas-of-land/

Ratriya Samachar Smiti, 2021. National Land Commission prepares to provide land to landless from mid-January 2022. The Himalayan Times [online] 27 October 2021. Available at: https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/national-land-commission-prepares-to-provide-land-to-landless-from-mid-january-2022 [Accessed on 1 November 2021].

Rawal, D.S., Agrawal, K., and Bhattarai, P., 2016. Microdynamics of land conflict and land conflict resolution in Nepal. International Organization for Migration (IOM).

Rising Nepal. 2019. Days are over for land mafia to capture public land. [online], 23 December. Available at: https://risingnepaldaily.com/interview/days-are-over-for-land-mafia-to-capture-public-land. [Accessed on 12 January 2021].

Satterthwaite, D., Archer, D., Colenbrander, S., Dodman, D., Hardoy, J., Mitlin, D. & Patel, S., 2020. Building resilience to climate change in informal settlements. One Earth Review, 2, pp.143-156.

Sengupta, U. and Sharma, S., 2009. No longer sukumbasis: Challenges in grassroots-led squatter resettlement program in Kathmandu with special reference to Kirtipur Housing Project. Habitat International, 33, pp.34–44.

Sengupta, U. and Sharma, S., 2006. The challenge of squatter settlements in Kathmandu. Addressing a policy vacuum. International Development Planning Review, (IDPR), 28 (1), pp.105-126.

Shah, D. 2021. Building houses for 145 squatters, [online] April 9. Available at: https://ekantipur.com/pradesh-1/2021/04/09/161793530292776485.html?fbclid=IwAR1IZvlkh93Lew9V1NVlucJMW_c5IJ2Jv6Scme1iwDON6tN-DfX40UWOjqc [Accessed on 12 April 2021].

Shrestha, R., Zevenbergen, J. Masum F. and Banskota, M., 2018. “Action space” based urban land governance pattern: Implication in managing informal settlements from the perspective of low-income housing. Sustainability, 10, 2202; DOI:10.3390/su10072202.

Shrestha, P. and Aranya, R., 2015. Claiming invited and invented spaces: Contingencies for insurgent planning practices. International Planning Studies, pp.1-20. DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2015.1028909

Shrestha, B., 2013. Squatter settlements in the Kathmandu Valley: Looking through the prism of land rights and tenure security. Urban Forum, 24, pp.119–135.

Shrestha, R., Joshi, J. R., Deuja J., Panday. U. S., 2021. Informal settlers: Identifying the genuine settlers and landless of Nepal. FIG e-Working Week 2021 Smart Surveyors for Land and Water Management - Challenges in a New Reality Virtual, 21–25 June 2021.

Smythe, E. and Spence, D., 2012. Re-viewing literature in hermeneutic research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(1), pp.12-25.

Tanaka, M., 2009. From confrontation to collaboration: A decade in the work of the squatters’ movement in Nepal. Environment & Urbanization, 21(1), pp.143–159. DOI: 10.1177/0956247809103011

The Kathmandu Post, 2016. Five years on, state still undecided on squatter resettlement plan, [online] May 9. Available at:

https://kathmandupost.com/valley/2016/05/09/five-years-on-state-still-undecided-on-squatter-resettlement-plan [Accessed on 1 May 2020].

The Kathmandu Post, 2021. Ruling, opposition parties on collision course after land commission scrapped, 6 August [online]. Available at: https://kathmandupost.com/politics/2021/08/06/ruling-opposition-parties-on-collision-course-after-land-commission-scrapped [Accessed on 6 August 2021].

GoN. 2005. Town Development Directives. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Urban Development.

UN-Habitat, 2006. The state of the world’s cities report 2006/7: The millennium development goals and urban sustainability. London: Earthscan.

UN- Habitat, 2007. Twenty first session of the governing council. Sustainable urbanisation: Local action for urban poverty reduction, emphasis on finance and planning. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

UN-Habitat, 2010. Nepal urban housing sector profile. Retried from: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/download-manager-files/Nepal%20Urban%20Housing%20Sector%20Profile.pdf

UN, 2017. New urban agenda habitat III. ISBN: 978-92-1-132731-1. United Nations

UN, n.d. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations

Zárate, L., 2016. They are not “informal settlements”— they are habitats made by people. Lorena Zárate, Mexico City. [online] Available at: <https://www.thenatureofcities.com/2016/04/26/they-are-not-informal-settlements-they-are-habitats-made-by-people/>

Downloads

Published

2022-05-18

How to Cite

“INCLUSIVE POLICIES, EXCLUSIONARY PRACTICES: UNFOLDING THE PARADOX OF PROLONGED URBAN INFORMALITY DEBATES IN URBANISING NEPAL” (2022) New Angle: Nepal journal of social science and public policy, 7(1), pp. 32–56. doi:10.53037/na.v7i1.66.